Your memory may be lying to you

In an experiment, psychologists gathered 3 real incidents about each participant’s past.

During the experiment, participants were narrated these 3 incidents. And then a 4th one entirely fabricated. For example:

Getting lost in a shopping mall as a child, being reunited by a kind elderly gentleman or a police officer. Or the horrors they experienced being lost.

None of the participants had experienced the incident.

Yet they accepted it; in fact, they recalled the incident in vivid detail.

This is the misinformation effect:

Our brain is not a camera capturing accurate details.

It is a storyteller filing gaps, reconstructing our memory based on suggestions, emotions, time elapsed, conversations after the meeting and most importantly, the story we want to believe.

Why does this matter?

It impacts our relationships at work

Imagine a heated project review or a miscommunication with a client that happened 6 months back: 5 people from that same meeting, each asked to recall what happened.

You will get five different stories.

  • One person remembers who spoke first.
  • Another remembers the tone.
  • A third is certain a specific commitment was made.
  • The fourth doesn’t recall any commitment at all.
  • The fifth remembers the room going quiet — but not why.

All five were present. All five are telling the truth as they remember it.

Learning?

When someone remembers the incident differently, before digging in, I try to ASK:

  • What if we are both right?
  • What if we are both wrong?

Have you heard different versions about the same incident? Share your experience in comments.

Leave a comment